Stats

2
Projects
9
Devlogs
24
Votes
1
Ships

Coding Time

All Time: 16h 46m
Today: 0h 0m

Member Since

June 22, 2025

Badges

1
🚢
Maiden Voyage
you shipped your first project! the journey begins...

Projects

2
Monster Synth
8 devlogs about 2 months ago
🚀
1 devlog about 2 months ago

Activity

Hey, it has been a while until the latest update, i was busy working out new things and working out the assets and ideas toghether, here you will see a sneak peak of the pets that you may encounter, animations are in progress. I will also take a look at authentication not working reported by some users.
Thanks for reading, have a nice day

Update attachment

Been working with the cloud GPU provider to create the assets, meanwhile that i am waiting for those to finish that it will take still approx 110 hrs i got a basic screen for your pets hatching/evolving screen

Update attachment

Heya guys, finally got the first build of the website for beta v0.1 working, now it supports authentication and home, feedback pages, you can finally go there and leave suggestions directly on thoughts for the website.
Here's the demo: https://monster-synth-frontend.vercel.app/home

Update attachment

Got myself a VM for rent to setup custom pets for yall, post in comments what you want as inspo, every comment will get their own easter egg related to the project

Update attachment

🗳️ Community Poll: Choosing the Pet Evolution System

Help me decide how our pets should evolve! Vote for your favorite option below.

🔍 Evaluating Your Options

1. Single Track → Fixed Evolution

  • Pros
    • Easy to implement; few assets to design (one per preset stage) [ stage 1, stage 2, stage 3, final stage ].
  • Cons
    • Limited post-hatch customization; minimal ongoing “discovery.”

2. Multiple Tracks → Layered Dynamic Evolution

  • Pros
    • Greater visual variety and daily engagement; modular assets (base + accessories).
  • Cons
    • Must design combinations or layers for every trait; more complex asset management.

3. On-Demand AI Generation

  • Pros
    • Infinite variants with high music-driven personalization.
  • Cons
    • High computational cost, latency, stylistic inconsistency, complex cloud/CLI integration.

🗳️ Cast Your Vote

  • [ ] Single Track → Fixed Evolution
  • [ ] Multiple Tracks → Layered Dynamic Evolution
  • [ ] On-Demand AI Generation
Update attachment

Built the initial look for the homepage, structured the code to support authentication and protected routes, also been working on polishing the graphics and overall layout of the website for the webapp. Next i will work on the REAL DEAL, the Monster Itself, but it will take me quite some while to create them :3

Update attachment

Done authentication, initial commit to get a Vercel Deploy for Front-End, Backend will be in the future both self hosted and public.
Now configuring the OAuth app to sign up using Github Providers

Update attachment

Started the development of the WebApp, checklist and roadmap are in the github link. Currently working towards setting up Db with Supabase, User Storage and Authentication with Providers

Update attachment
LumaAlexia
LumaAlexia created a project
53d ago

Monster Synth

Monster Synth is a Tamagotchi-style web app where you feed your digital pet songs—their BPM, pitch and timbre shape its mood, appearance and growth. Built with Next.js + Supabase on the frontend and NestJS + Prisma on the backend, it’s a playful fusion of music analysis and virtual pet care. || AI Was used to create the Assets and to Generate More in the future ||

Monster Synth
8 devlogs 3 followers Shipped

Created and Updated Readme with Styling and Tracking for HackaTime Integration for HackClub Summer of Making Event

Update attachment
LumaAlexia
LumaAlexia created a project
54d ago

Readme Profile

Readme Profile built with Markscribe to keep track of Projects Built during Summer of Making

1 devlog 0 followers
LumaAlexia
LumaAlexia joined Summer of Making
54d ago

This was widely regarded as a great move by everyone.